Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Tax and Spend’ Category

How New Hampshire Poaches Massachusetts Businesses

Friday, July 8th, 2011

A fascinating account in today’s Boston Globe about how New Hampshire poaches Massachusetts businesses:

New Hampshire pays Michael Bergeron to be a full-time thief, sending him across the border in an unmarked black sedan to poach Massachusetts companies.

To help keep his missions undercover, the business recruiter even scraped the New Hampshire state seal off his Ford Fusion. Equal parts real estate agent, financial adviser, and deal fixer, Bergeron has lured dozens of Massachusetts companies to the Granite State over the past few years with promises of lower tax bills, cheaper office and industrial space, and fewer regulations.

John Hancock Financial and Liberty Mutual Group are among the high-profile firms that recently moved significant parts of their operations over the state line – partially because of Bergeron’s pitches. And an increasing number of small and midsize firms are considering migrating as a way to reduce costs in uncertain economic times.

“New Hampshire has become an easier place to do business as Massachusetts has become more difficult,’’ said Bergeron, who works as a business development manager for the New Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development. “It’s a lower cost to do business here and you still have the availability of the skilled workforce in Massachusetts.’’

His PowerPoint presentations highlight what New Hampshire officials say is Massachusetts’ bad-business reputation. They cite expensive real estate, drawn-out permitting processes, and higher taxes.

There are no official statistics from Massachusetts or New Hampshire on the number of companies that have moved north. But Bergeron estimates that at least 5,000 new jobs have been created over the past five years as a result of Massachusetts businesses moving to his state.

Massachusetts officials and business leaders deny that a mass exodus is underway, although they acknowledge that New Hampshire’s aggressive recruitment tactics can’t be ignored.

Liberty in Economics Banner

Related Posts:

NH Taxpayers Rejoice . . . Local Tax Caps are Legal Again

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

The Union Leader reports that Gov. Lynch has signed SB2 which allows for local tax caps . . . New Hampshire taxpayers rejoice!

Manchester’s tax cap, rejected by the New Hampshire Supreme Court in early 2010, is back in place.

Gov. John Lynch signed a bill Tuesday that clears the way for cities, towns and school districts to adopt caps on local tax increases, and restores caps that may have had legal problems.

Senate Bill 2, which took effect immediately, states that any tax cap that voters elected to make part of their charter is now valid, whether or not it was legal to adopt the cap at the time it passed.

The bill gives communities clear guidelines and greater leeway in adopting the caps. It also allows caps to be exceeded with supermajority votes of the local governing body . . .

SB 2 does not set out a specific percentage of votes needed to exceed a cap. Instead, it allows communities and school districts to choose the level, which is most often either a two-thirds majority or of a three-fifths majority.

The new law sets out the wording that a ballot question on a local tax cap must contain. It allows voters to decide whether to cap annual tax increases by a certain percentage or by a dollar amount.

The cap must be adopted by a three-fifths majority — 60 percent of voters — to take effect. Manchester’s cap passed by a narrower margin, gaining 54.4 percent of the vote.

Liberty in Economics Banner

Related Posts:

Connecticut Raises Sales Tax . . . Helping New Hampshire’s Economy

Monday, May 9th, 2011

Bloomberg is reporting that Connecticut just raised taxes by $2.6 billion.  Why does this matter to New Hampshire?  Part of the tax increase includes raising the sales tax . . .

It boosts the retail-sales levy to 6.35 percent from 6 percent while broadening it to cover previously exempt goods and services. The rate becomes 7 percent on “luxuries” such as $1,000-plus clothing and boats above $100,000.

Since New Hampshire is the closest state to Connecticut without a sales tax, this will surely mean that more folks from the Nutmeg state will be shopping here more often (or spend more when they do)–just as Maine residents do already.

It would also help if New Hampshire’s policymakers dropped the cigarette tax rate since Connecticut’s cigarette tax is at $3 per pack (the second highest in the country).  Also, Connecticut’s sales tax is applied to the price of cigarettes which means their increase in the sales tax rate also increases the total tax burden on cigarettes.

Overall, this is bad news for Connecticut taxpayers but good news for New Hampshire retailers.

Liberty in Economics Banner

Related Posts:

Cross-Border Shoppers Help Fuel New Hampshire’s Economy

Thursday, April 28th, 2011

Check out my latest story at Examiner.com on how cross-border shoppers helps fuel New Hampshire’s economy.

Liberty in Economics Banner

Related Posts:

New Hampshire Needs to Lower the Cigarette Tax to Preserve Retail Competiveness

Tuesday, April 19th, 2011

The Union Leader has an editorial today arguing that New Hampshire’s $1.78 per pack cigarette tax rate is too high.  However, the editorial does not really touch on the cross-border shopping angle.  As we found recently, New Hampshire’s economy is a retail mecca for out-of-state shoppers.  More specifically, in 2007, New Hampshire’s economy benefits from an additional $2.2 billion in sales thanks to Maine cross-border shoppers adding thousands of jobs to the economy.

New Hampshire’s cigarette tax back in 2007 was very favorable relative to Maine’s with a tax differential of $14.40 per carton (includes sales tax in Maine) . . . now, not so much with a tax differential of only $5.19 per carton.  Cutting the cigarette tax rate by 10 cents, as currently proposed in the Legislature, would help ensure New Hampshire keeps its retail competitiveness–the tax differential between Maine and New Hampshire would climb to $6.24 per carton.

Chart 4 Additional Taxes on Cigarettes Paid in Maine (vs. New Hampshire)

Liberty in Economics Banner

Related Posts: