Economic Benefits of the “New Hampshire Advantage”

The data for chart below is taken from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s State Coincident Index. The chart shows that New Hampshire’s economy has outperformed every other New England state since July 1992 (the base year of the index = 100). Massachusetts comes in second followed by Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont and Maine.

However, New Hampshire can’t sit still. The state government still has plenty of work to do, especially by enacting right-to-work and reforming the pension system.

Will NH Households Pay $1,010 Tax Hike to Solve Public Pension Crisis?

NHCEP has found previously that New Hampshire’s official public pension burden is much lower than the real public pension burden (pdf).  Now, Joshua D. Rauh just announced on his blog about a new study that he just released, with Robert Novy-Marx, that estimates state and local pension contributions need to increase by a factor of 2.5 to reach solvency in 30 years.  For the average American household, that amounts to a tax increase of $1,398 per household, per year!

The study is titled “The Revenue Demands of Public Employee Pension Promises.” (pdf)  Here is the abstract:

We calculate the increases in state and local revenues required to achieve full funding of state and local pension systems in the U.S. over the next 30 years. Without policy changes, contributions to these systems would have to immediately increase by a factor of 2.5, reaching 14.2% of the total own-revenue generated by state and local governments (taxes, fees and charges). This represents a tax increase of $1,398 per U.S. household per year, above and beyond revenue generated by expected economic growth. In thirteen states the necessary increases are more than $1,500 per household per year, and in five states they are more than $2,000 per household per year. Shifting all new employees onto defined contribution plans and Social Security still leaves required increases at an average of $1,223 per household. Even with a hard freeze of all benefits at today’s levels, contributions still have to rise by more than $800 per U.S. household to achieve full funding in 30 years. Accounting for endogenous shifts in the tax base in response to tax increases or spending cuts increases the dispersion in required incremental contributions among states.

The chart below is taken from Table 5 of their study on page 40 which ranks the states (from highest to lowest) in terms of the size of the necessary tax hike, per year, to achieve solvency of the state’s public pension system.  As you can see, New Jersey ranks top in the country at $2,475 while Indiana comes in last at $329.

The good news is that, relative to the rest of the country, New Hampshire’s taxpayers are better off coming in as the 31st highest tax increase in the country.  The bad news is that New Hampshire’s taxpayers must still face a tax hike of $1,010 per household, per year!  In terms of the budget, the annual pension contribution would more than double under their analysis from $400 million to $900 million.  Instead of a tax hike, New Hampshire needs pension reform (pdf).

In the News: April 8, 2011

The Hippo, New Hampshire’s largest circulation weekly and second largest circulation newspaper, just ran another story featuring J. Scott Moody’s comments (see pages 6 & 7) based on our new study on Solutions to New Hampshire’s pension crisis (pdf).